According to the Healthy Hospital Revenue Cycle Index, $262 billion in healthcare claims are initially denied. It’s no secret that denials management has become one of the top issues experienced by healthcare financial executives. Many organizations have focused more intently on creating solutions that address denials head-on, along with their root causes. Executives understand that to truly avoid denials, claims need to be managed properly upfront…. to eliminate the need to be reactive later. In this article, we’ll cover the most common types of denials, a few ways to manage them, medical necessity, and how to break the cycle. Imagine the stability and financial strength your organization can gain when you take this step forward.
A recent Medical Economics article identifies the top 13 reasons for claim denials; some of which include:
The astounding truth is that 90% of these types of claim issues are preventable! It’s critical to start creating proactive strategies to ensure claims are submitted correctly and reimbursed, avoiding denials. If you are tired of correcting and re-submitting claims, it’s time to look upstream to identify the process that triggers these denials.
Denials are managed to ensure that claims can be submitted and that compensation can be received for patient services. However, the better option should be to prevent denials, not manage them.
When a formal denials prevention process doesn’t exist or isn’t followed, the number of denials inevitably increases. This potentially places your organization at risk. Over time, the denials volume and process non-compliance can force healthcare organizations to take on the daunting task of reviewing what’s happening and optimize.
Over the years, medical necessity has been listed as one of the top five denial reasons. The more organizations use a reactive approach to correct denials after the claim has been submitted, the longer the issue will exist.
If the average provider only performs procedures and tests that are necessary, then the problem stems from a lack of appropriate explanation of the need for the procedure. Registration staff must be educated to request clarification and additional documentation if needed. Thorough clinical documentation should support correct coding, resulting in claim forms that are error-free and have a clear explanation description, prior to submittal for payment.
Use a comprehensive denials prevention strategy to identify where your processes are misaligned with industry best practices.
Also, expand your understanding of revenue cycle improvement as an opportunity to show a significant and immediate ROI. Here is a list of six solutions as a guide to help you achieve optimal revenue cycle practices.
“After a revenue cycle assessment identified the admissions process as not meeting best practice expectations, one Southern California medical center engaged a project team to restructure their process -- the project cost was $40,000. In the first 3 months, denials decreased significantly, they achieved a $60,000 return on investment, with an annualized return of $240,000.”
The residual year-over-year improvement goes directly to the bottom line and provides additional capital that can be invested in the many needed improvements and enhancements for the organization.
While you contemplate your denials prevention strategy, also check out the blog entitled, “You Are Not Alone - The DNFB Challenge” to understand the common reasons that accounts are held in DNFB status, 6 steps to reduce DNFB’s, and how your back office can help as you streamline your process.
ROI’s Best in KLAS team of certified revenue cycle experts are available to offer insights and answer your burning questions. With extensive knowledge in leading practice consulting, revenue cycle roadmaps, and system optimization, ROI has the team and approach to help you to drive revenue cycle excellence within your organization.
Schedule a call with ROI at https://roihs.com/contact-us